"КИНОДИВА" Кино, сериалы и мультфильмы. Всё обо всём!

Информация о пользователе

Привет, Гость! Войдите или зарегистрируйтесь.


Вы здесь » "КИНОДИВА" Кино, сериалы и мультфильмы. Всё обо всём! » Дом, семья и развлечения. » World News in English. Mashed: Vanity Fair.Celebrity.Lifestyle.Money..


World News in English. Mashed: Vanity Fair.Celebrity.Lifestyle.Money..

Сообщений 821 страница 840 из 874

1

World News in English. Mashed: Vanity Fair. Celebrity. Lifestyle.Money

http://sd.uploads.ru/t/aqYbR.png

World News in English.
The Cheat Sheet
This is Meghan Markle's Diet
Travel&Leisure
Family recipe.http://sh.uploads.ru/t/thI9J.gif 
It's an old Middleton family recipe.
Money
President Kennedy’s Favorite Waffle Recipe
Celebrity.  Lifestyle.
16 Hsting Rules Kate Middleton Never Breaks
Quotes about Life
Prince Philip to retire from public duties at age of 96
Vanity Fair.
All types of modern short stories are here with better language.
You are welcome to read these short stories so as to enjoy your time.
Life Hacks
Popular Destinations for Flights
Gig poster

etc

+1

821

The New York Times
Rich Countries Signed Away a Chance to Vaccinate the World

Selam Gebrekidan and Matt Apuzzo
Mon, March 22, 2021, 3:13 PM
A nurse received a COVID-19 vaccine in Rostock, Germany, Feb. 12, 2021. (Lena Mucha/The New York Times)
A nurse received a COVID-19 vaccine in Rostock, Germany, Feb. 12, 2021. (Lena Mucha/The New York Times)

In the coming days, a patent will finally be issued on a five-year-old invention, a feat of molecular engineering that is at the heart of at least five major COVID-19 vaccines. And the U.S. government will control that patent.

The new patent presents an opportunity to exact leverage over the drug companies producing the vaccines and pressure them to expand access to less affluent countries.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

The question is whether the government will do anything at all.

The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, achieved at record speed and financed by massive public funding in the United States, the European Union and Britain, represents a great triumph of the pandemic. Governments partnered with drugmakers, pouring in billions of dollars to procure raw materials, finance clinical trials and retrofit factories. Billions more were committed to buy the finished product.

But this Western success has created stark inequity. Residents of wealthy and middle-income countries have received about 90% of the nearly 400 million vaccines delivered so far. Under current projections, many of the rest will have to wait years.

Growing numbers of health officials and advocacy groups worldwide are calling for Western governments to use aggressive powers — most of them rarely or never used before — to force companies to publish vaccine recipes, share their know-how and ramp up manufacturing.

Governments have resisted. By partnering with drug companies, Western leaders bought their way to the front of the line. But they also ignored years of warnings — and explicit calls from the World Health Organization — to include contract language that would have guaranteed doses for poor countries or encouraged companies to share their knowledge and the patents they control.

Western health officials said they never intended to exclude others. But with their own countries facing massive death tolls, the focus was at home. Patent-sharing, they said, simply never came up.

President Joe Biden has promised to help an Indian company produce about 1 billion doses by the end of 2022, and his administration has donated doses to Mexico and Canada. But he has made it clear that his focus is at home.

“We’re going to start off making sure Americans are taken care of first,” Biden said recently. “But we’re then going to try and help the rest of the world.”

Pressuring companies to share patents could be seen as undermining innovation, sabotaging drugmakers or picking drawn-out and expensive fights with the very companies digging a way out of the pandemic.

As rich countries fight to keep things as they are, others like South Africa and India have taken the battle to the World Trade Organization, seeking a waiver on patent restrictions for COVID-19 vaccines.

Russia and China, meanwhile, have promised to fill the void as part of their vaccine diplomacy.

Addressing patents would not by itself solve the vaccine imbalance. Retrofitting or constructing factories would take time. More raw materials would need to be manufactured. Regulators would have to approve new assembly lines.

And as with cooking a complicated dish, giving someone a list of ingredients is no substitute for showing them how to make it.

To address these problems, the WHO created a technology pool last year to encourage companies to share know-how with manufacturers in lower-income nations.

Not a single vaccine company has signed up.

Drug company executives told European lawmakers recently that they were licensing their vaccines as quickly as possible but that finding partners with the right technology was challenging.

But manufacturers from Canada to Bangladesh say they can make vaccines; they just lack patent licensing deals. When the price is right, companies have shared secrets with new manufacturers in just months, ramping up production and retrofitting factories.

Despite the hefty government funding, drug companies control nearly all the intellectual property and stand to make fortunes off the vaccines. A critical exception is the patent expected to be approved soon — a government-led discovery for manipulating a key coronavirus protein.

This breakthrough, at the center of the 2020 race for a vaccine, actually came years earlier in a National Institutes of Health lab, where an American scientist named Dr. Barney Graham was in pursuit of a medical moonshot.

For years, Graham searched for a key to unlock universal vaccines — genetic blueprints to be used against any of the roughly two dozen viral families that infect humans. When a new virus emerged, scientists could simply tweak the code and quickly make a vaccine.

In 2016, while working on Middle East respiratory syndrome, another coronavirus known as MERS, he and his colleagues developed a way to swap a pair of amino acids in the coronavirus spike protein. That bit of molecular engineering, they realized, could be used to develop effective vaccines against any coronavirus. The government, along with its partners at Dartmouth College and the Scripps Research Institute, filed for a patent, which will be issued March 30.

When Chinese scientists published the genetic code of the new coronavirus in January 2020, Graham’s team had their cookbook ready.

Within a few days, they emailed the vaccine’s genetic blueprint to Moderna to begin manufacturing. By late February, Moderna had produced enough vaccines for government-run clinical trials.

Exactly who holds patents for which vaccines will not be sorted out for months or years. But it is clear now that several of today’s vaccines — including those from Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax, CureVac and Pfizer-BioNTech — rely on the 2016 invention. Of those, only BioNTech has paid the U.S. government to license the technology.

Patent lawyers and public health advocates say it is likely that other companies will either have to negotiate a licensing agreement with the government or face the prospect of a lawsuit worth billions.

The National Institutes of Health declined to comment on its discussions with the drugmakers but said it did not anticipate a dispute over patent infringement.

In May, the leaders of Pakistan, Ghana, South Africa and others called for governments to support a “people’s vaccine” that could be quickly manufactured and given for free. They urged the governing body of the WHO to treat vaccines as “global public goods.”

The Trump administration moved swiftly to block it. Intent on protecting intellectual property, the government said calls for equitable access to vaccines and treatments sent “the wrong message to innovators.”

World leaders ultimately approved a watered-down declaration that recognized extensive immunization — not the vaccines themselves — as a global public good.

That same month, the WHO launched the technology access pool and called on governments to include clauses in their drug contracts guaranteeing equitable distribution. But the world’s richest nations roundly ignored the call.

In the United States, Operation Warp Speed, a Trump administration program that funded the search for vaccines in the United States, disbursed more than $10 billion to hand-picked companies and absorbing the financial risks of bringing a vaccine to market. The deals came with few strings attached.

Large chunks of the contracts are redacted, and some remain secret. But public records show that the government used unusual contracts that omitted its right to take over intellectual property or influence the price and availability of vaccines. They did not let the government compel companies to share their technology.

By comparison, one of the world’s largest health financiers, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, includes grant language requiring equitable access to vaccines. As leverage, the organization retains some right to the intellectual property.

For months, the United States and European Union have blocked a proposal at the World Trade Organization that would waive intellectual property rights for COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. The application, put forward by South Africa and India with support from most developing nations, has been bogged down in procedural hearings.

“Every minute we are deadlocked in the negotiating room, people are dying,” said Mustaqeem De Gama, a South African diplomat involved in the talks.

But in Washington, leaders are still worried about undermining innovation.

During the presidential campaign, Biden’s team gathered top intellectual property lawyers to discuss ways to increase vaccine production. Among them was the use of a federal law allowing the government to seize a company’s patent and give it to another in order to increase supply. Former campaign advisers say the Biden camp was lukewarm to this proposal and others that called for a broader exercise of its powers.

The administration has instead promised to give $4 billion to Covax, the global vaccine alliance. But Covax aims to vaccinate only 20% of people in the world’s poorest countries this year and faces a $2 billion shortfall even to accomplish that.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2021 The New York Times Company

0

822

Reuters
Russia's top diplomat starts China visit with call to reduce U.S. dollar use

Gabrielle Tétrault-Farber and Andrew Osborn
Mon, March 22, 2021, 11:36 AM

By Gabrielle Tétrault-Farber and Andrew Osborn

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov began a visit to China on Monday with a call for Moscow and Beijing to reduce their dependence on the U.S. dollar and Western payment systems to push back against what he called the West's ideological agenda.

Lavrov, on a two-day visit to China, is expected to hold talks with his Chinese counterpart at a time when both countries' ties with the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden are badly strained.

U.S. and Chinese officials on Friday concluded what Washington called "tough and direct" talks in Alaska, while Russia's ambassador arrived back in Moscow on Sunday for consultations after Biden said he believed President Vladimir Putin was a killer.

Russia is also braced for a new round of U.S. sanctions over what Washington says was its meddling in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, which Moscow denies.

Speaking to Chinese media before the start of his visit, Lavrov said Moscow and Beijing were compelled to develop independently of Washington in order to thwart what he said were U.S. attempts to curb their technological development.

"We need to reduce sanctions risks by bolstering our technological independence, by switching to payments in our national currencies and global currencies that serve as an alternative to the dollar," Lavrov said, according to a transcript of his interview released on Monday.

"We need to move away from using international payment systems controlled by the West."

Ahead of his visit, a Chinese state newspaper, The Global Times, suggested Lavrov's trip was a sign of how close China-Russia coordination would offset the impact of what it called "U.S. troublemaking."

"The timing of Lavrov's visit is noteworthy as it means Russia is the first country China shares information and opinions with on key issues after the China-US face-to-face communication," it said.

0

823

Mon, March 22, 2021, 4:39 PM

LONDON (Reuters) - AstraZeneca expects the EU drug regulator to give approval for a factory in the Netherlands that is at the centre of a row between Britain and the European Union over COVID-19 vaccine supplies later this month or in early April, a senior executive said on Monday.

The status of the Leiden-based plant, which is run by sub-contractor Halix and is helping to make the AstraZeneca shot, is closely watched as it is listed as a supplier of vaccines in both the contracts that AstraZeneca has signed with Britain and with the European Union.

"We are well on track in order to get the approval by EMA (European Medicines Agency) in the course of March, beginning of April, and this is exactly according to our plan," said Ruud Dobber, executive vice president of the BioPharmaceuticals business on a briefing.

Executives would not be drawn on when Britain's drug watchdog may give the nod to accept Halix-produced shots.

After falling far behind post-Brexit Britain and the United States in rolling out vaccines, the EU's leaders are set to discuss imposing a ban on vaccine exports to Britain at a summit on Thursday.

Without regulatory approval, vaccines produced at Halix cannot be used in either the EU or Britain.

Astra executives said the site would play a relatively small role in supplies to the EU, which mostly relied on production from a Belgium site and another one in the United States.

On the briefing, Mene Pangalos, head of BioPharmaceuticals R&D, said one batch of Halix-produced shots had been sent to Britain ahead of approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Dobber said the U.S. authorities are "very excited" by its interim analysis of data from its U.S. clinical trial, which shows the vaccine is 79% effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19.

But it is up to the U.S. government to decide how they are distributed, he said.

Asked if there was any indication how the shots that will be supplied to the U.S. government under its supply contract may be used, he said he would be "very surprised" if they were not deployed to vaccinate Americans.

He said the company can supply 50 million doses to the United States in the first month after approval and 15-20 million doses on average after that.

(Reporting by Kate Kelland in London, Ludwig Burger in Frankfurt and Pushkala Aripaka in Bangaluru; Writing by Josephine Mason, editing by Louise Heavens and Barbara Lewis)

0

824

'Sad day for Boulder': Gunman kills 10 at Colorado supermarket, including police officer, in second US mass shooting in a week

Jorge L. Ortiz and Sady Swanson, USA TODAY NETWORK
Tue, March 23, 2021, 7:58 AM

BOULDER, Colo. — Ten people were killed Monday, including a police officer, when a gunman opened fire at a supermarket in Boulder, Colorado, the second mass shooting in the U.S. in a week.

"These were people going about their day, doing their shopping," Boulder District Attorney Michael Dougherty said at a late-night press briefing. He described the day's events as "a tragedy and a nightmare."

The police officer who died was identified as Eric Talley, 51, an 11-year veteran on the Boulder force. Talley was responding to the King Soopers grocery market when he was gunned down. His police chief, Maris Herold, appeared to be choking back tears as she spoke to the media Monday night and confirmed the death toll.

"I have to tell you [of] the heroic action of this officer when he responded at the scene," Herold said, explaining the Boulder Police Department got a call about shots fired early in the afternoon. "Officer Talley responded to the scene – he was the first on the scene – and he was fatally shot.

"My heart goes out to the victims of this incident and I am grateful to the police officers that responded," she said. "And I am so sorry about the loss of Officer Talley."

0

825

People

Tenn. Man Loses Winning Lottery Ticket Worth $1.2 Million — But Then Luck Strikes Twice

Tennessee Lottery Nick Slatten

A Tennessee man won $1 million in the lottery, lost it, then got it back — all within the span of a day.

Nick Slatten had luck on his side in more ways than one after he not only won the Tennessee Cash lottery, but managed to recover his missing winning ticket in a store parking lot.

Slatten's good fortune began on March 10, when he stopped by a local grocery store to buy a drink and a lottery ticket after spending the day laying tile, the Tennessee Education Lottery said in a press release.

The next morning, the Sparta resident was shocked to discover the Tennessee Cash ticket he'd bought was a winner worth a whopping $1,178,746.

"I was stunned. I couldn't believe it. I can't express it. It was something else," he said in the release.

After visiting his fiancée Michelle at work to tell her the good news, Slatten went about the rest of his day running errands, from going out to lunch to taking his brother to buy a car part at O'Reilly's Auto Parts.

But about an hour later, Slatten realized he no longer had his winning lottery ticket.

"I couldn't find it anywhere," he said in the release.

As the release explained, tickets are finders keepers: anyone who found it would be able to pick up the ticket and claim it as their own.

"The Lottery always encourages players to sign their ticket immediately after purchase to identify it as theirs and to help prevent someone else from cashing it, in the event that it is lost or stolen," the release said.

With his fate hanging in the balance, Slatten retraced his steps and eventually found himself back at the auto store, where lo and behold, the missing ticket was waiting for him, lying on the ground in the parking lot next to the driver's side door of another vehicle.

"It's a million-dollar ticket, and someone stepped right over it," he said in the release, which noted that the weather was breezy that day.

Slatten told the Tennessee Education Lottery that he and Michelle plan to keep their jobs, and want to use their winnings to buy a house of their own and upgrade their vehicles.

Slatten said in the release that his new windfall will allow him to live his life with "not a whole lot of worries."

0

826

In a rare interview, Prince Albert of Monaco gives advice to Prince Harry

"this type of public display of dissatisfaction... these types of conversations should be held in the intimate quarters of the family... it did bother me"

- Prince Albert of Monaco

When asked to lend advice to Harry, 36, Prince Albert answered,

"Well, I wish him the best but it's a difficult world out there and I hope that he can have the judgement and wisdom to make the right choices."

0

827

Lilibet Diana's Birth Announcement Shows How Much Has Changed Since Archie Was Born

Victoria Murphy
Mon, June 7, 2021, 3:37 PM

Photo credit: Max Mumby/Indigo - Getty Images
Lilibet “Lili” Diana Mountbatten-Windsor came into the world just 25 months after her big brother, Archie Harrison. The little girl has made the Queen a great grandmother for the 11th time and also completed, so they have said anyway, Harry and Meghan’s family (“Two it is” the Duchess told Oprah earlier this year).
Two children, only two years apart. Yet the announcement of Lili’s birth has also served as a reminder of just how big a 24 months it has been for the Sussexes. The way in which the statement was released, its content and to whom it was sent, all highlight just how different their circumstances are to 2019—as well as how much happier the couple seem.
When Harry and Meghan stepped back from official royal life, a central aim was to gain more control over how they spent their time and who had access to them. Their deep frustration and unhappiness was already showing by the time Archie was born, when they pushed back against royal convention and declined to name his place of birth or pose for a large-scale photocall. As their team faced backlash over technical issues in making the announcement, debate around the Sussexes’ choices versus royal baby expectations also formed the backdrop of their son’s arrival on May 6, 2019.
But by the time their daughter came into the world, on June 4, 2021, they had successfully made it clear that they were doing things on their own terms. No longer working royals or receiving any taxpayer funding, the Sussexes have removed the basis for an argument that their lives are in any way public property. While flag-waving fans descended on the streets of Windsor for Archie’s arrival, despite the fact there was no possibility of catching a glimpse of him, there has been no attempt at, or expectation of, any kind of public moment for Lili’s arrival.

Photo credit: WPA Pool - Getty Images
Instead, Harry and Meghan were able to have a whole two days with their daughter before telling the world of her birth, which they did on June 6. They were also able to choose the wording of their announcement without any consideration for royal precedent, and handpick which media they wanted to send it to ahead of an embargo set for 12 p.m. ET. They let it be known that they will not be releasing a photograph at this time, and there remains no indication (and no backlash about this lack on indication) of when we may first catch a glimpse of baby Lili.
What is also notable, however, is the fact that, now that they have control, the Sussexes seem much happier to be open. The information about the birth location they strove to keep secret when it was expected (it was eventually revealed via Archie’s birth certificate that he was born at the Portland Hospital) was readily offered up this time around. The fact that Lili was born at the Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital was provided alongside details spelling out why they chose the name Lilibet Diana—after her great grandmother’s childhood nickname and to honor her “beloved” late grandmother. Indeed, it is notable that while in the fold of “the Firm” and fighting to do things their own way, Harry and Meghan selected names for their son that did not have an obvious family or royal connection. Now they have their freedom, the names chosen for their daughter emphasize their bond with—and some have suggested offer an olive branch to—Harry's family.
Everything about this announcement has been on Harry and Meghan’s terms. They have made it clear to us once again that they are in control as they move forward with their new lives. But Lilibet Diana also reminds us that Harry’s royal roots remain very much a part of their future.

0

828

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/ee/49/6a/ee496aaa25bb8f46388db9e416b15f7a.jpg

The Telegraph

Palace frustration over Lilibet name choice is part of wider annoyance over Sussexes’ departure

0

829

Tom Sykes
Sun, June 13, 2021, 7:58 PM

Queen Elizabeth Greets Joe Biden and Dr. Jill Biden in Stunning Style at Windsor Castle

https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/markiza98/77963947/3489642/3489642_800.jpg

Joe Biden and the First Lady were greeted by Queen Elizabeth Sunday at Windsor Castle, where they were given a formal military welcome, followed by a decidedly more informal British tradition—an afternoon cup of tea.

In gorgeous afternoon sunshine, the queen emerged from the Sovereign’s Entrance of Windsor Castle at exactly 1705 local time (1205 EST) and precisely three minutes later, she greeted the Bidens in the shade of an elegant tent set up in castle’s quadrangle, as part of what looks certain to be the biggest set piece image of Biden’s visit to Europe.

The Bidens had touched down a mere 15 minutes earlier on Marine One, having boarded the chopper at London’s Heathrow airport, whence they had flown from the G7 summit in Cornwall in Airforce One. They were treated to a selection of American-themed musical performances by the band of the Grenadier Guards including John Philip Sousa’s The Stars and Stripes Forever, while they waited the appropriate moment to enter the quadrangle.

The queen, wearing a floral pink dress and matching hat, looked on sparkling form, smiling broadly and chatting with Biden and his wife Dr. Jill Biden, in marked contrast to the stiff formality that pervaded the atmosphere when she greeted Donald Trump at the same venue in 2018 and again at London’s Buckingham Palace in 2019.

On both those occasions, there were street protests against Trump; by comparison, today’s crowds in Windsor seemed entirely supportive of the new president, although as all the activity was taking place inside the curtain wall of Britain’s most picturesque castle, there was little for them to see other than Marine One flying overhead.

The Guard of Honor to salute the Bidens was assembled of the Queen’s Company First Battalion Grenadier Guards. They gave a traditional royal salute and the American national anthem was also played.

Biden wore a dark suit and the First Lady wore a lavender blue jacket and dress suit.

Biden, accompanied by senior British military officers, was then invited to inspect the Guard of Honor, a tradition going back to the middle ages. As he toured the troops, to the accompaniment of The Star Spangled Banner, Her Majesty leaned towards Dr. Biden and appeared to engage her in small talk.

There then followed an extravagant display of marching and salutes, the Grenadier Guards’ crimson jackets making a vivid contrast to the green sward of the lawn underneath a perfect blue sky.

Sunday’s welcome of the visiting president marked yet another high profile public duty for the queen following the death of her husband, Prince Philip, in April, aged 99. It was actually the third time she had met Joe Biden; she met him at the G7 reception on Friday but they also met in 1982 when he was the Democratic senator for Delaware.

The queen met Harry S. Truman in 1951 before she ascended to the throne and has since then met every president except Lyndon B. Johnson.

After the military formalities were over, the queen and the Bidens entered the cool of the castle for tea. Their conversation will remain private, however a photograph was released of the Bidens in the Grand Corridor at Windsor Castle with the queen.

It is widely expected the president will offer his condolences on the the death of her husband. He wrote to her privately after Philip died, as The Daily Beast has reported, and issued a public statement saying: “From his service during World War II, to his 73 years alongside the Queen, and his entire life in the public eye—Prince Philip gladly dedicated himself to the people of the U.K., the Commonwealth, and to his family.”

Senior courtiers previously told The Daily Beast that the queen’s meeting with Biden could be understood as a statement of her ongoing commitment to her duty, echoing the remarks she made on her 21st birthday (which are given some prominence on the royal family’s website) when she said, in a radio address: “I declare before you all that my whole life, whether it be long or short, shall be devoted to your service and the service of our great imperial family to which we all belong.”

The private afternoon tea lasted around 40 minutes, with the suitably refreshed Bidens departing on Marine One at 1810 local time (1310 Eastern).

0

830

Biden will warn Putin the US will respond 'forcefully' if Russia continues its 'reckless and aggressive actions,' Blinken says

Рresident Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Geneva on June 16. Angela Weiss/Alexey Druzhinin/Getty Images

    Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Biden will warn President Putin against further "aggressive actions."

    Biden is expected to meet with the Russian president for the first time Wednesday.

    Their meeting follows a string of major cyberattacks in the US that are believed to have originated in Russia.

    See more stories on Insider's business page.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Sunday said President Joe Biden will warn Russian President Vladimir Putin against committing future "reckless and aggressive actions" when he meets with him in Geneva later this week.

"This is not going to be a flip the light switch moment," Blinken told CNN's Dana Bash during an appearance Sunday on "State of the Union." "What the president is going to make clear to President Putin is we seek a more stable, predictable relationship with Russia."

He added: "But if Russia chooses to continue reckless and aggressive actions, we will respond forcefully as the president has already demonstrated that he would when it comes to election interference, or the Solar Winds cyber attack, or the attempt to murder Mr. Navalny with a chemical weapon."

Aleksei Navalny, the leader of the Russian opposition, fell ill in August last year. In December, the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said Navalny had been poisoned using a substance with a "similar structural characteristics" to the Novichok family of highly potent nerve agents, according to The New York Times.

0

831

Unanimous Vote Is Final Step Toward Removing Roosevelt Statue
Laura Zornosa
Wed, June 23, 2021, 3:08 PM

https://news2.ru/user_images/230507/603635_1592794304.jpg

NEW YORK — After more than a year of talk, it’s official: The Theodore Roosevelt statue in front of the American Museum of Natural History is coming down.

The New York City Public Design Commission voted unanimously at a public meeting Monday to relocate the statue by long-term loan to a cultural institution dedicated to the life and legacy of the former president. (No institution has been designated yet, and discussions about its ultimate destination are ongoing.)

The vote follows years of protest and adverse public reaction over the statue as a symbol of colonialism, largely because of the Native American and African men who are depicted flanking Roosevelt on a horse. Those objections led the museum in June 2020 to propose removing the statue. New York City, which owns the building and property, agreed to the suggestion, and Mayor Bill de Blasio expressed his support.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

In 2017, a mayoral commission set up to review city art, monuments and markers had considered historical research about the statue but could not reach a consensus on removing it.

“Height is power in public art, and Roosevelt’s stature on his noble steed visibly expresses dominance and superiority over the Native American and African figures,” the panel wrote in its report, delivered in January 2018.

At the time, about half of the commission wanted to relocate the sculpture, and about half recommended additional historical research before making a decision. Only a few members wanted to leave the statue where it was, if on-site context was provided.

At Monday’s meeting, made public as a YouTube video, Sam Biederman of the New York City Parks Department said that although the statue “was not erected with malice of intent,” its composition “supports a thematic framework of colonization and racism.”

The museum had spent years working with academics and advisers, both before and after the statue was considered by the mayor’s monuments commission. In 2019, that research culminated in an exhibition about the sculpture’s context and history — and how the public perceived it.

“The understanding of statues and monuments as powerful and hurtful symbols of systemic racism became even more evident in the wake of the movement for racial justice that emerged after the murder of George Floyd,” Dan Slippen, vice president of government relations at the museum, said at the meeting. “It has become clear that removing the statue would be a symbol of progress toward an inclusive and equitable community.”

© 2021 The New York Times Company

0

832

Интервью Меган Маркл и принца Гарри - Лингвистический разбор.
Что скрывает королевская семья ?

0

833

The Telegraph
I can’t wait to get rid of my face mask, says Duchess of Cornwall

Victoria Ward
Wed, July 7, 2021
https://i.pinimg.com/474x/65/d3/37/65d337d8e5ca812f11ff9fc82510324f.jpg
Charles and Camilla.

The Duchess of Cornwall

The Duchess of Cornwall has revealed she is looking forward to ditching her face mask, telling a Welsh college student “I can’t wait to get rid of these”.

Her comment came as the Government prepares to remove the legal requirement to wear a mask indoors.

The proposal has prompted much debate, with health charities and unions warning that people will be put at risk if the rules are scrapped.

The Duchess and the Prince of Wales were visiting the Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama.

On arrival, the Duchess told William Pearson, who is studying for an MA in advanced opera performance, “I can’t wait to get rid of these” as she touched her mask.

Among those urging Boris Johnson to maintain legal requirements around face coverings on Wednesday was Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, who suggested the Prime Minister was trying to "wish away" the practical problems that will come with a possible 100,000 coronavirus infections a day.

Sir Keir told the Commons: "We should open up in a controlled way, keeping baseline protections such as masks on public transport, improving ventilation, making sure the Track and Trace system remains effective, and ensuring proper payments for self-isolation.”

Grant Shapps, the Transport Secretary, said he would be "very relaxed" if any bus and train operators in England continued to require passengers to wear face coverings from July 19.

"If you're travelling on the Underground and it's pretty packed, and the wearing of a face covering may well be helpful to increase confidence,” he said.
Mandatory masks in airports

Airports are considering new by-laws to make masks mandatory, despite plans to lift all restrictions.

Travellers who refuse to wear them without good reason could face fines if the airports go ahead with the move although it would be a civil rather than a criminal offence.

The airports point to recommendations by the International Civil Aviation Authority on the need for face coverings and the decision by UK airlines to continue to require mandatory masks on passenger flights.

Penalties would range from fines to a maximum of five years in prison, although this is reserved for the most serious offences where the safety of passengers was threatened.

The airports are awaiting guidance from the Department for Transport before deciding how to proceed but would only be able to impose civil sanctions.

A source said: “We are keen face masks remain in terminal buildings but how to enforce it is difficult.

“We are looking at ways to do it including by-laws. The airlines have come out strongly in making it mandatory so we need to coordinate our response. If we cannot mandate it, it will certainly be strongly advised.”

Meanwhile, the Unite union said masks should be mandatory in bank branches to keep staff safe, while Dr Katherine Henderson, president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, said that face masks may still be needed in A&E departments to "keep people safe".

0

834

Unvaccinated Americans say COVID vaccines are riskier than the virus, even as Delta surges among them

Andrew Romano
•West Coast Correspondent
Tue, July 20, 2021, 12:00 PM

When asked which poses a greater risk to their health, more unvaccinated Americans say the COVID-19 vaccines than say the virus itself, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll — a view that contradicts all available science and data and underscores the challenges that the United States will continue to face as it struggles to stop a growing “pandemic of the unvaccinated” driven by the hyper-contagious Delta variant.
The survey of 1,715 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 13 to 15, found that just 29 percent of unvaccinated Americans believe the virus poses a greater risk to their health than the vaccines — significantly less than the number who believe the vaccines represent the greater health risk (37 percent) or say they’re not sure (34 percent).
Over the last 18 months, COVID-19 has killed more than 4.1 million people worldwide, including more than 600,000 in the U.S. At the same time, more than 2 billion people worldwide — and more than 186 million Americans — have been at least partially vaccinated against the virus, and scientists who study data on their reported side effects continue to find that the vaccines are extraordinarily safe.
Yet 93 percent of unvaccinated U.S. adults — the equivalent of 76 million people — say they will either “never” get vaccinated (51 percent); that they will keep waiting “to see what happens to others before deciding” (20 percent); or that they’re not sure (22 percent).
With Delta rapidly becoming dominant nationwide, U.S. COVID-19 cases have surged by 140 percent over the last two weeks. Hospitalizations and deaths — both lagging indicators — are up by one-third over the same period. Missouri, Arkansas, Nevada and Florida are being hit particularly hard, with hospitalization rates soaring to 2-3 times the national average. Nearly all of the Americans who are falling ill, getting hospitalized and dying — 99 percent, according to some estimates — are unvaccinated. And more than half the U.S. population (52 percent) has yet to be fully inoculated.
As the Delta variant surges among the unvaccinated and counties such as Los Angeles reinstitute indoor mask mandates to try to stave it off, Yahoo News and YouGov sought to understand why so many Americans continue to hold off on vaccination — and whether Delta’s rise might change any minds.
The results are complicated. Some unvaccinated Americans recognize the rising threat of Delta. The share who say they are worried about the variant has risen 9 percentage points (from 25 percent to 34 percent) since last month. Yet the share of unvaccinated Americans who say they are not worried about Delta is larger, and it has risen by nearly as much (from 31 percent to 39 percent).
As such, just half of the unvaccinated say Delta poses “a serious risk” to “all Americans” (33 percent) or “unvaccinated Americans” (17 percent); the other half says the variant doesn’t pose a serious risk to anyone (30 percent) or that they’re not sure (20 percent). In contrast, a full 85 percent of vaccinated Americans — and 72 percent of all Americans — say Delta poses a serious risk.
Yet while unvaccinated Americans are relatively dismissive of Delta’s dangers — which have been amply proven by massive outbreaks in India and elsewhere — they tend to apply a much lower bar to the COVID vaccines. Asked to pick the “most important reason” they haven’t been vaccinated, for example, few say they lack “easy access to vaccination” (4 percent), “can’t get time off from work” (3 percent), or “already had COVID” (9 percent). More say they’re not worried about getting COVID (12 percent) or — far more frequently — that they don’t trust the COVID vaccines (45 percent).
But why? The most important reason, according to 37 percent of unvaccinated Americans, is that they’re “concerned about long-term side effects.” That’s followed by “I don’t trust the government” (17 percent), “The vaccines are too new” (16 percent), “The FDA hasn’t fully approved the vaccines yet” (11 percent) and “I don’t trust any vaccines” (6 percent).
The trouble for public health officials is twofold. First, despite the fact that there’s no precedent in the history of vaccines for severe side effects emerging several months after dosage, let alone several years — and no mechanism by which the COVID vaccines would trigger such side effects — it’s difficult to convince skeptics that this time won’t be different. Meanwhile, the pandemic is ongoing and the clock is ticking.
Second, when unvaccinated skeptics are asked to select “all” the reasons they don’t trust the COVID vaccines — as opposed to just the “most important” — many select all of them. Seventy percent say they’re concerned about long-term side effects; 60 percent say the vaccines are too new; 55 percent say they don’t trust the government; 50 percent say they’re concerned about short-term side effects; 45 percent say the FDA hasn’t fully approved the vaccines yet; 45 percent say they don’t trust drug companies; and 26 percent say they don’t trust any vaccines. Hesitancy, in other words, could turn into a game of whack-a-mole: address one concern and another just pops up to replace it.
Whether Delta’s impact softens any of this resistance remains to be seen. Fifteen percent of unvaccinated Americans say the spread of Delta makes them more likely to get vaccinated, particularly Democrats (34 percent) and Latinos (34 percent). Yet another 12 percent of unvaccinated Americans actually say Delta makes them less likely to get a shot, and 73 percent say it makes “no difference.”
Delving deeper, 20 percent of unvaccinated Americans say they would be “much more” (10 percent) or “somewhat more” (10 percent) likely to get vaccinated “if COVID cases start to rise among unvaccinated people in [their] area”; the same goes for rising local hospitalizations and deaths. Likewise, 27 percent of unvaccinated Americans say they’d be either much more (12 percent) or somewhat more (15 percent) likely to get vaccinated when the FDA fully approves the COVID vaccines, which are currently authorized for emergency use to combat the pandemic.
Full FDA approval isn’t expected until next year. COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths, on the other hand, are already rising. We’ll see if either makes a difference.
_________________________
The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,715 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 13 to 15, 2021. This sample was weighted according to gender, age, race and education based on the American Community Survey, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, as well as 2020 presidential vote (or non-vote), and voter registration status. Respondents were selected from YouGov’s opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.7 percent.

0

835

Miami Herald
Most vaccinated Americans would get COVID booster as delta variant spreads, poll finds

A majority of vaccinated Americans said in a new poll that they would get a COVID booster shot if it became available.

Sixty-two percent of vaccinated Americans said they would get a booster as the delta variant, which was first discovered in India, continues to spread, according to a Yahoo News/YouGov poll conducted July 13-15 based on a sample size of 1,715 adults. The margin of error is around 2.7 percentage points.

Pfizer and BioNTech said earlier this month they plan to ask for a COVID-19 vaccine booster to be authorized in the U.S. and in Europe, Reuters reported. There is evidence that there is a higher risk of infection six months after getting vaccinated, according to the publication.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a joint statement on July 8 that fully vaccinated Americans don’t need a booster shot right now and are monitoring when it could be necessary to get one.

“People who are fully vaccinated are protected from severe disease and death, including from the variants currently circulating in the country such as delta,” the statement read. “People who are not vaccinated remain at risk. Virtually all COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths are among those who are unvaccinated.”

The survey also found that of the Americans who have heard of the delta variant, 31% said they were “very worried” and 36% said they were “somewhat worried.”

Of the people surveyed who haven’t been vaccinated, 45% said they don’t trust COVID vaccines, 12% said they weren’t worried about getting COVID, 9% said they already had COVID and 4% said they don’t have “easy access to vaccination.”

Of the respondents who said they don’t trust the COVID vaccines, 60% said the vaccines were “too new,” 45% said the FDA hasn’t fully approved the shots yet, 50% said they were worried about short-term side effects, 70% said they were worried about long-term side

effects, 55% said they don’t trust the government and 45% said they don’t trust the drug companies.

Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, said in a July 16 briefing that more than 97% of people who are getting hospitalized with COVID are unvaccinated, CNN reported.

“This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” Walensky said.

The recent spike in COVID-19 cases across the country has been fueled by vaccine hesitancy and the delta variant, which has spread to multiple countries.

More than 186 million people in the U.S. have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine as of July 19, including more than 161 million who are fully vaccinated, according to the CDC.

1 in 5 Americans believes microchips are hidden in COVID vaccines, poll finds

How much do Americans trust science? Confidence wanes — but politics matter, poll says

0

836

ABC News
Texas hospital reports its 1st case of lambda COVID-19 variant

MARLENE LENTHANG
Tue, July 20, 2021, 9:30 PM

A major Texas hospital system has reported its first case of the lambda COVID-19 variant, as the state reels from the rampant delta variant.

Houston Methodist Hospital, which operates eight hospitals in its network, said the first lambda case was confirmed Monday.

The lambda variant was first detected in Peru in December 2020, according to the World Health Organization and makes up 81% of COVID-19 cases sequenced in the country since April 2021, according to a June WHO report. Currently, WHO designates lambda as a "variant of interest."

Houston Methodist had a little over 100 COVID-19 patients across the hospital system last week. That number rose to 185 Monday, with a majority of those infected being unvaccinated, according to a statement released by the hospital Monday.

Among those infections, about 85% have been diagnosed with the delta variant, hospital officials said.

"We're seeing an alarming spike in the number of COVID-19 cases across the Houston area, with the steepest increase happening over the weekend," Houston Methodist said. "The increased hospitalizations add stress to many of our hospitals that are nearing capacity."

Hospital president and CEO Dr. Marc Boom stressed it is "imperative" that the community "get vaccinated and decrease virus spread."

Despite the report of the lambda variant, experts at Houston Methodist say delta is still the primary concern in the U.S.

"The lambda is the dominant variant in Peru and Peru has had a very difficult time with COVID-19. It shares mutations in common with the alpha variants, the beta, the gamma, which is the dominant variant in Brazil," Dr. Wesley Long, medical director of Diagnostic Microbiology at Houston Methodist, told ABC News.

"I don't think there's sufficient evidence at this point that we should be more concerned about lambda than delta, I still think delta is the primary concern for us. There's a lot more evidence that we have that delta is much more contagious, the viral loads are much higher," he added.

The lambda variant "has been associated with substantive rates of community transmission in multiple countries, with rising prevalence over time concurrent with increased COVID-19 incidence," the WHO said in its June report. In June, the variant was detected in 29 countries.

The delta variant, which was first detected in India in December, now accounts for about 83% of all sequenced COVID-19 cases in the United States, Center for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a Senate hearing Tuesday. The WHO designates delta as a "variant of concern."

MORE: COVID-19 vaccines protect you better than infection, doctors say

Long noted that Houston Methodist has seen its positivity rate increase and hospitalizations rise, but the situation on the ground is still "far below" the winter peak.

"[Infections are] on the increase. How many more cases are we going to get?" Long said. "We're going to need more folks to get vaccinated and folks who aren't vaccinated in particular to practice all the safe practices that we learned through the pandemic to help slow the spread of COVID. All those are critically important to keep this delta wave under control."

At the moment, 51% of Texas' state population aged 12 and up is fully vaccinated, according to state data.

0

837

https://i.pinimg.com/564x/32/e9/c2/32e9c299d69de52010a708cee8419276.jpg
Claude Monet, Impression, Sunrise, 1872

Impressionism

Impressionism is my personal favorite. Whenever I try to paint realism, I feel unsatisfied by the tedious detail which is required and I slowly progress back into impressionism.

I love the challenge of merely capturing the essentials in a scene and ignoring the needless details. This can be a difficult task, as it is easy simply miss the mark. Too much detail and you will have a confused and tight painting. Too little and you start verging into complete abstract territory.

At best, impressionism combines amazing use of color and value in beautiful harmony, without needless detail. At worst, impressionism could be used as an excuse for sloppy technique (I certainly have been guilty of this in the past).

The issue with impressionism is it can be misunderstood by those who do not practice art (usually the same people who praise hyper and photo-realism). Even when the impressionist movement started it was met with great criticism by a community more accustomed to realist styles.

However, most artists will appreciate the difficulty of impressionism. The great impressionists will use simple techniques to give just hints of form and movement which come together in beautiful harmony. Most of the work is left to the viewer's imagination.

I want you to picture a stormy seascape that you want to paint. Most people will try to paint exactly what they see in the seascape. The dark contours, the bright highlights hitting the tops of the water and the snaking lines of foam on top.

But what if instead you tried to create the feel and emotion of the stormy scene without care for the accurate visual portrayal of the scene. This in my opinion is very difficult to achieve.

Most of the time you will end up with a mess of colors on the canvas with no real harmony. But if you get it right, then people will know what it is just from the overall feel of the painting and the subtle hints left behind. But if you look closely, it would not look exactly like the scene you have painted.


What is the hardest painting style?

A very common question, especially amongst those who are just starting out with painting. It is a strangely difficult question to answer. On first thought, most people would be quick to say realism or hyper realism are the most challenging (as many people tend to think the primary goal of painting is to create something that looks just like a photograph). Personally, I think this is a silly question but it does raise an interesting discussion. Every style of painting is challenging in...

0

838

House Beautiful Windsor Castle Staff Have "Stripped" Meghan and Harry's Remaining Belongings from Frogmore Cottage

0

839

Harper's Bazaar
Queen Elizabeth Heads to Balmoral For the First Summer Since Prince Philip's Death

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4d/Balmoral_Castle.jpg/411px-Balmoral_Castle.jpg

Queen Elizabeth has begun her first summer holiday since the death of Prince Philip.

The queen headed off to Balmoral in Scotland from Windsor Castle Friday. The monarch and the Duke of Edinburgh would typically retreat to the Scottish castle every year from August until the fall. This year marks the first visit since Prince Philip passed away last April at the age of 99.

People reports that the queen will likely receive visits this year from Prince William and Duchess Kate with their three children, as well as Princess Eugenie and mom-to-be Princess Beatrice and their families.

Balmoral has served as a private retreat for the British royals for over 150 years, since Queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert, purchased the castle and the surrounding 7,000 acre estate. At Balmoral, the royals normally like to entertain friends, picnic, hold dances and go on shooting parties in the highlands.

Though the queen and the Duke of Edinburgh spent most of last year in Windsor Castle, where they began isolating in March 2020, they were able to continue the tradition of spending the summer in Balmoral last August. The holiday took place with new precautions, with staff forming a "Balmoral bubble" and visitors social distancing during encounters with the queen and Prince Philip.

0

840

The New York Times
Why Do American Grocery Stores Still Have an Ethnic Aisle?
Priya Krishna
Tue, August 10, 2021, 9:36 PM

Сhitra Agrawal, the founder of Brooklyn Delhi, has spent many hours thinking about where in the grocery store her Indian condiments might sell the best.

Positioning her premade sauces alongside pasta sauce, she imagined, might encourage spaghetti lovers to make Indian food. On the other hand, she could be setting her products up for removal from the aisle, as they probably wouldn’t sell as well as pasta sauce. Then there’s her mango chutney, which is essentially a fruit condiment. Would placing it among other jams and jellies make sense, or confuse shoppers?

The spot where her products have found the most success is the so-called ethnic or international aisle, the global smorgasbord that has long been a fixture of American groceries — wide-ranging, yet somehow detached from the rest of the store.

Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times

“Consumers are trained, if they want Indian products, to go to that aisle,” said Agrawal, 42. “Do I like the fact that that is the way it is? No.”

New York, where she runs her company out of her home, is one of the most diverse cities in the world. Yet even there, the ethnic aisle persists, and its composition often perplexes her. “I buy Finnish crackers. Why are they not in the ethnic aisle?” she said. “An Asian rice cracker would be in the ethnic aisle.”

Today, the section can seem like an anachronism — a cramming of countless cultures into a single small enclave, in a country where an estimated 40% of the population identifies as nonwhite, according to the Census Bureau, and where H Mart, a Korean American supermarket chain, has become one of the fastest-growing retailers by specializing in foods from around the world. Even the word “ethnic,” emblazoned on signs over many of these corridors, feels meaningless, as everyone has an ethnicity.

In 2019, Kroger, one of the world’s largest retailers, accelerated its effort to move products from the ethnic aisle into other parts of the store. Local retail chains, like Food Bazaar in the New York metropolitan area, have sections dedicated to specific countries, like Pakistan and Ecuador, rather than a single international section. Megastores like H Mart and online grocers like Weee! have turned the old supermarket model inside out by putting non-Western foods front and center.

But at many grocery stores, a wholesale elimination of the ethnic aisle may not be easy, or even all that popular.

To shoppers like Jolene Tolbert, a fitness instructor in York, Pennsylvania, who described herself as “your basic 55-year-old white lady,” the aisle is a “wonderland” for finding ingredients. “I think if these items were mixed in with everything else it would make shopping a lot more difficult,” she said.

Robert Ashley, 42, a stay-at-home father in Norman, Oklahoma, said he doesn’t love the quality or selection in his local grocer’s ethnic section, but it’s better than having to drive all the way to a Vietnamese market in Oklahoma City to get soy sauce.

Several food purveyors of color see the aisle as a necessary evil — a way to introduce their products to shoppers who may be unfamiliar with, say, Indian food — though a barrier to bigger success.

In some ways, the ethnic aisle sums up the predicament of its suppliers, many of whom approach store buyers without the money often needed to get their products on the shelf. Corporations like Pepsi and Nestle can afford to pay stores handsomely to ensure their products get prime placement on shelves and a presence in promotions. Some companies break out of the ethnic aisle only when they’re acquired by larger companies. Others, like Goya and Maruchan ramen, are broadly recognizable, encouraging placement in both ethnic and other sections.

Toyin Kolawole, whose company in the Chicago suburbs, Iya Foods, sells products made with African ingredients, said she tried to get her cassava flour into the flour aisle at a Midwestern retailer, but it was placed in the ethnic lane. “Then,” she added, “when some of the bigger companies who are not minorities launched cassava flour, they put them in the flour aisle.”

“I want an opportunity to compete,” said Kolawole, 43.

Cuong Pham, the founder and CEO of Red Boat, a Bay Area company, wants customers to use its fish sauce for pastas and vinaigrettes, not just in East Asian dishes. But because it is usually placed in the ethnic aisle, he said, it limits perceptions of the ingredient’s uses.

Pham said the aisle seems to exist more for those looking to find ingredients new to them than for the communities whose cuisines are represented there.

That aligns with the ethnic aisle’s original purpose: to serve returning World War II soldiers who had tasted foods from countries like Italy, Germany and Japan while abroad. But while many of the European foods eventually migrated out of the section, most of the foods from other parts remained. (Conversely, some grocery stores in countries like France and Colombia have “American” aisles, with products like peanut butter, mayonnaise, boxed cake mix and barbecue sauce.)

Errol Schweizer, who was the vice president of grocery at Whole Foods Market from 2009 to 2016, said the ethnic aisle is part of “a legacy of white supremacy and colonialism” built into the framework of the grocery business — starting with the low wages paid to hourly workers, who are often people of color, and the lack of diversity among store buyers.

He said he and other employees frequently talked about eliminating the ethnic aisle at Whole Foods; but they couldn’t persuade the company to make such a major overhaul.

That didn’t stop them from making sure every aisle — not just the ethnic one — included diverse flavors and ingredients, he added, or from improving the section, known as the “global flavors aisle,” by increasing the variety of countries represented and finding more purveyors of color.

A spokesperson for Whole Foods said, “The same brand may have some products grouped for meal building in our global flavors aisles and other products with salty snacks, cookies, or in our specialty department,” and added that the goals of the strategy are to “provide customers with ideas for using the product and to make it easy to find.”

As an adviser and board member for retailers and consumer packaged goods companies, Schweizer believes industrywide change will be slow. “There is more to it than what you see on the shelf — there is how the money works, how the distributors are set up, and how the retailers themselves think people are shopping.”

Kroger conducted a study at a Houston store in 2019 to see whether customers preferred non-European products in dedicated aisles or intermixed with other foods. Shoppers overwhelmingly favored incorporation. Today, Mexican Coca-Cola sits alongside domestic sodas, Maseca corn flour with the other flours.

But most Kroger stores still have ethnic sections. Dan De La Rosa, Kroger’s group vice president of fresh merchandising, said the company could eventually move away from them as the nation grows more diverse.

Large retailers Albertsons and Walmart are also integrating more non-Western products throughout their stores, but representatives for the two said that in some locations, customers still seek out certain items in the ethnic section.

In cities with large immigrant populations like New York, some local chains have reconfigured the conventional grocery-store layout to cater to their neighborhoods. On a recent Friday at the Trade Fair branch in Astoria, Queens, chicken feet and plantains greeted customers at the entrance. In the Food Bazaar store in Woodside, Queens, an expansive frozen section is dedicated to dumplings.

“We have never really adhered to” the ethnic aisle model “because we feel it is obsolete,” said Edward Suh, executive vice president of Food Bazaar’s parent company, Bogopa Enterprises.

Last year, Noramay Cadena and Shayna Harris started Supply Change Capital, a venture capital firm that funds food companies with multicultural founders. This month the partners started the New American Table, a coalition of investors and entrepreneurs of color that will meet regularly with store buyers and brokers to make the case for a more inclusive grocery business.

“Part of dismantling the ethnic aisle is engaging with the decision-makers and the gatekeepers on this huge economic opportunity they are missing out by continuing to have a Eurocentric supermarket,” Harris said.

There are plenty of examples they can point to. In January, Sprouts stores started selling various Mexican cookies from Siete Foods in the cookie aisle. They quickly became the bestselling cookies there, according to a July report from Spins, a data technology company.

Adnan Durrani, the founder of Saffron Road, said his premade sauces like Thai red curry and tikka masala sell significantly better when incorporated with all the other sauces. It helps, he added, that he has Americanized the names of some dishes: Aloo matar became Delhi potatoes. Dal makhani became Bombay lentils.

Yet that is precisely why some purveyors want their products to remain in the ethnic aisle: They don’t want to dilute the foods’ identity in the effort to sell to a wide audience.

Hansen Shieh, 36, who runs the noodle soup company One Culture Foods, said he knows his goods would probably sell better in the soup section, but he preferred to go with the ethnic aisle. “What I was willing to make that trade-off for was for a shopper who more intentionally had the desire to find something in that realm, that Asian product realm,” he said.

He doesn’t want his soups to become the next hummus — widely known but often divorced from its cultural background.

Redesigning a store without an ethnic aisle can introduce new challenges, as the employees of Providore Fine Foods in Portland, Oregon, found out last year. “Very quickly you start to see just how limiting the current conventions are,” said Patrick Leonard, a buyer and manager. It wasn’t clear, for instance, where ingredients like tamarind, preserved cabbage or pomegranate molasses might live.

“If you inter-shelve products based on the same conventional categories and get rid of the ethnic aisle,” he said, it may reduce these items to “a trendy sauce to top your lunch, and it takes away some of the actual cultural context of those products.”

The employees’ solution has been to put the same product in a few places, and include signs providing background on items and how they’re used.

That desire for more nuanced storytelling prompted sisters Kim and Vanessa Pham to start their Asian sauce kit company, Omsom, as an online business last year, rather than sell in grocery stores. They wanted to showcase their food on their terms, unconfined by the ethnic aisle. (They even posted a TikTok video denouncing the aisle. “We never felt celebrated or seen by it,” Kim Pham said.)

The company sold half a million sauces in a little over a year. Yet the Phams don’t believe that Omsom’s products can become American pantry staples until they’re more widely sold in stores. They recently started meeting with store buyers, hopeful that their track record will give them some say about the placement of their items.

Still, they said, there’s a real possibility that buyers will want them in the ethnic aisle. And reluctantly, the sisters agreed: They’ll just have to go with it.

© 2021 The New York Times Company

0


Вы здесь » "КИНОДИВА" Кино, сериалы и мультфильмы. Всё обо всём! » Дом, семья и развлечения. » World News in English. Mashed: Vanity Fair.Celebrity.Lifestyle.Money..